Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4230075 Journal of the American College of Radiology 2015 9 Pages PDF
Abstract
The chief difference between the 2 CDS systems, and the strongest influence on outcomes, was how exams without relevant guidelines or with insufficient information were handled. Nuance augmented published guidelines with clinical best practice; Medicalis requested additional information utilizing pop-up windows. Thus, guideline implementation choices contributed to decision making and outcomes. User interface, specifically, the number of screens and completeness of indication choices, controlled CDS interactions and, coupled with guidance implementation, influenced willingness to use the CDS system.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Radiology and Imaging
Authors
, , , , , ,