Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4230075 | Journal of the American College of Radiology | 2015 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
The chief difference between the 2 CDS systems, and the strongest influence on outcomes, was how exams without relevant guidelines or with insufficient information were handled. Nuance augmented published guidelines with clinical best practice; Medicalis requested additional information utilizing pop-up windows. Thus, guideline implementation choices contributed to decision making and outcomes. User interface, specifically, the number of screens and completeness of indication choices, controlled CDS interactions and, coupled with guidance implementation, influenced willingness to use the CDS system.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Erika PhD, Stacy Zelenka, Paul MD, Dan BA, Jennifer MS, Nancy A. PhD,