Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4230491 | Journal of the American College of Radiology | 2015 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Inappropriate imaging can lead to unnecessary medical radiologic exposures and cost and may not answer the clinical question. Imaging referral guidelines inform the justification of radiologic procedures and facilitate the choice of the best test first, but their acceptance by referrers, use, and value may be limited by shortcomings in the methodology of development. Focusing on common, essential elements of methodology will help guideline developers. In 2012 and 2013, the International Atomic Energy Agency hosted Technical Meetings on Radiation Protection of Patients Through the Development of Appropriateness Criteria in Diagnostic Imaging. Participants identified and agreed on issues concerning development of imaging referral guidelines. Items based on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument were amended with additional items including development and consensus group composition. Consensus was sought on 28 items, 18 of which were agreed should be uniform, and 10 should allow for regional differences. Further work is required to encourage, provide, and identify higher quality evidence and to agree on a grading system for recommendations. Many key areas are common to guideline developers globally, opening the way for international collaboration to help demystify, simplify, and justify.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Denis MA, MB.BS, MRCP, James MD, Ola PhD, Michael MBChB, M.Med (Rad), PhD, Richard Mendelson, Anusha BHB, MBChB, Martin MD, Michael MD,