Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4236350 | Journal de Radiologie | 2006 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Ultrasound is unsuited for the diagnosis of microcalcifications because it fails to visualize a mass in one-third of cancers and the existence of a mass is correlated with malignancy in one-third of cases. Furthermore, US does not correct the false-negative errors of mammography, and it underestimates the rate of malignancy by ascribing a benign appearance to 50% of cancers, which mammography correctly classifies BI-RADS 4 or 5.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
C. Balu-Maestro, C. Chapellier, I. Ben Taaritt, M. Fournol,