Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4238028 | Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2013 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
Interventionalists have an array of tools from which to choose for personal radiation protection; however, for a variety of reasons related to lack of availability or choice, these tools are not universally employed. Further study may be of value to clarify why comfort was cited most often as the primary barrier to the use of protective eyewear and difficulty of use was cited as the primary barrier to use of mounted shields (despite reporting that concern for radiation-induced injury to the eye is paramount). It may also be of interest to further study why certain devices with demonstrable protection effects are not readily available, such as rolling/hanging and patient-mounted shields.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
G. Emmett MD, Daniel K. MD, Robert G. MD, James E. MD,