| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4239352 | Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2012 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The present study failed to prove any substantial clinical benefit provided by UAT with regard to effectiveness or safety compared with standard CDT. Given the added costs of the US delivery device, prospective randomized data are needed to justify its widespread use for DVT treatment.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Reginald MD, Shaun MD, James F. MD, Alex MD, Heiko MD,