Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4245665 | Radiología | 2011 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
The craniocaudal view was more sensitive, although this difference was not statistically significant. The sensitivity of CAD was high for microcalcifications in all four density types; however, CAD's sensitivity for masses was low in density types 3 and 4. The CAD system only failed to mark 9.1% of the cancers presenting as masses but was not sensitive for the other two radiological findings included in this marking. Half of the interval carcinomas occurred in type 4 densities and 35.7% had been marked by the CAD sysem.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
C. Romero Castellano, C. Varela Nuñez, R. Cuena Boy, A. Almenar Gil, J.M. Pinto Varela, M. Botella Lopez,