Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
42465 | Applied Catalysis A: General | 2009 | 15 Pages |
Co/Al2O3 Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysts promoted with different quantities of Group 11 metals (Cu, Ag, Au) were characterized and tested. The presence of relatively small quantities of such metals enhanced Co reducibility and, in the cases of Ag and Au, improved the surface Co metal active site densities. EXAFS experiments with the most loaded catalyst samples show that only Co–Co and Me–Me (Me = Cu, Ag and Au) coordination could be observed. This suggests that the greater fraction of the metals form different phases. However, the reduction promoting effect of the Group 11 metal is severely hampered once the catalyst receives a mild passivation treatment following primary reduction. An explanation in terms of promoter segregation during primary reduction is proposed. At lower promoter levels (0.83%Ag and 1.51%Au) and higher Ag levels (2.76%), significant gains in Co active site densities were achieved resulting in improved CO conversion levels relative to the unpromoted catalyst. Moreover, slight decreases in light product (e.g., CH4) selectivity and slight increases in C5+ selectivity were achieved. At high Au loading (5.05%), however, too much Au was loaded which, although significantly increasing the fraction of Co reduced, blocked Co surface sites and resulted in decreased CO conversion rates. While Cu facilitated Co reduction, the increased fraction of reduced Co did not translate to improved active site densities. It appears that a fraction of Cu tended to cover the rim of Co clusters, resulting in decreases in CO conversion rates and detrimental increases in light product selectivity.
Graphical abstractCo/Al2O3 FT catalysts promoted with Group 11 metals were characterized by EXAFS/XANES and enhanced Co reducibility was observed. With 0.83% and 2.76% Ag and 1.51%Au, significant gains in Co active site densities were achieved resulting in improved CO conversion levels relative to the unpromoted catalyst in CSTR testing. Slight decreases in light product selectivity and slight increases in C5+ selectivity were also achieved.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide