| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4257865 | Transplantation Proceedings | 2010 | 4 Pages |
ObjectiveTo compare efficacy and safety of basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for induction therapy in kidney transplantation.MethodsA literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBMdisc, and Cochrane databases was used to identify randomized controlled trials that compared basiliximab and ATG for induction therapy in kidney transplantation. Inclusion criteria comprised: prospective randomized controlled clinical trials, follow-up time ≥12 months, randomized comparisons of ATG versus basiliximab as induction therapy in kidney transplantation. Meta-analytical techniques were applied to identify differences in outcomes between the two agents.ResultsA total of six studies involving 853 patients were identified. No differences between ATG and basiliximab were seen in terms of biopsy-proven rejection (relative risk [RR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–1.52, P = .31), delayed graft function (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.69–1.51, P = .93), graft loss (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.73–1.80, P = .55), and patient death (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.65–2.30, P = .54). But basiliximab had a lower incidence of infection (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97, P = .02) and neoplasm (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.97, P = .04).ConclusionsBasiliximab is as effective as ATG for induction therapy in kidney transplantation, whereas basiliximab has a lower incidence of infection. Basiliximab may be a safer and preferable option for induction therapy in kidney transplantation.
