| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4257956 | Transplantation Proceedings | 2014 | 6 Pages |
BackgroundFrom November 2003 to December 2012, in the Gdańsk Center, 64 patients received preemptive transplantation (PET). PET comprised 8% of 794 kidney transplantations performed during this time. The benefits for individual patients and for the health care system are discussed.MethodsThis study compares the outcomes of these PET patients who had their kidney pairs transplanted after a variable duration of dialysis (PTD), a total of 51 pairs.ResultsThe mean Charlson comorbidity index was 2.57 vs 3.04 (P > .05) for the PET and PTD groups, respectively. Both groups did not differ significantly with respect to 1-year patient and graft survivals, and incidences of acute rejection. Five (9.8%) PET patients and 20 (39%) PTD patients experienced delayed graft function (P < .05). The graft function (serum creatinine/4p MDRD) 1 year after transplantation was similar in both groups (1.42/53.7 vs 1.43/57.4; mg/dL/mL/min/1.73 m2). More PET patients continued normal professional activities or education before and after transplantation (P < .05).ConclusionsOur single-center results confirmed that for both medical and socioeconomic reasons, PET is an optimal mode of renal replacement therapy.
