Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4268333 | British Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology | 2012 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
SummaryAlthough quality outcome assessment is gaining widespread recognition, there is still no consensus about grading postoperative complications in urology. There have been several attempts to grade surgical complications. The Clavien–Dindo system has been standardised and validated. However there are limitations when using the system to grade urological complications. We suggest modification of the Clavien–Dindo system to include intraoperative complications. Widespread implementation of the grading system could benefit the transparent reporting of complications to demonstrate quality outcomes.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Surgery
Authors
Andy Myatt, Victor Palit, Neil Burgess, Chandra Shekhar Biyani, Adrian Joyce,