| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4270276 | The Journal of Sexual Medicine | 2013 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Followâup of our series provides evidence that retention of the original PRB at the time of nonâinfected AUS revision is safe. Potential advantages include elimination of a counter incision and technically challenging exploration. By eliminating these aspects, the potentially resultant decreased operative time may help counter the theoretical yet unproven risk of infection from leaving the old PRB in place. Köhler TS, Benson A, Ost L, Wilson SK, and Brant WO. Intentionally retained pressureâregulating balloon in artificial urinary sphincter revision. J Sex Med 2013;10:2566-2570.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Urology
Authors
Tobias S. MD, MPH, Aaron MD, Loren MD, Steven K. MD, William O. MD,