Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4271272 The Journal of Sexual Medicine 2011 7 Pages PDF
Abstract
In our series, the infection risk associated with revision of malfunctioning devices was no greater than primary implant placement. Rerouting was associated with a higher infection risk, likely due to technical factors, and not implant colonization. Less than 10% of our revision implants were colonized, and this had no bearing on the development of a postoperative infection. S. epidermidis was not the most common organism implicated in device infections. Finally, our experience with an adjuvant, alcohol-based skin prep warrants further randomized prospective evaluation. Kava BR, Kanagarajah P, and Ayyathurai R. Contemporary revision penile prosthesis surgery is not associated with a high risk of implant colonization or infection: A single-surgeon series.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Urology
Authors
, , ,