Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4279410 The American Journal of Surgery 2012 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundRecent literature suggests that peritoneal drainage (PD) is not helpful after elective pancreatectomy and may be detrimental. Data specific to distal pancreatectomy (DP) have not received prior evaluation.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent DP. Factors examined included postoperative morbidity and the need for therapeutic intervention.ResultsSixty-nine patients had DP, 30 without PD. Thirty-four patients suffered 45 complications, most were intra-abdominal in nature. Twelve, 19, and 3 patients required radiologic drainage, reoperation, or both, respectively. There was no difference between groups relative to intra-abdominal complications or the need for therapeutic intervention. Of 39 patients undergoing PD, 19 had abdominal morbidity. The drain was useful in identifying and/or treating the complication in 3 patients.ConclusionsFirst, PD after DP does not confer a reduction in morbidity or the need for therapeutic intervention versus patients with no drains. Second, the presence of a drain infrequently was helpful in detecting complications. Third, a multi-institutional, randomized study is recommended.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Surgery
Authors
, , ,