| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4279554 | The American Journal of Surgery | 2012 | 4 Pages |
BackgroundThe objective of this study was to determine whether health care disparities exist in management of Graves' disease.MethodsPatients treated for Graves' disease from 1999 to 2009 were divided into medical and surgical treatment groups. A comparative analysis of age, sex, race, health insurance, and income was completed. Address and/or zip code were geocoded and median income was determined from census data.ResultsA total of 634 patients were treated for Graves' disease; 535 (84%) medically and 99 (16%) surgically. Mean age (40 ± 15 vs 43 ± 11 y), percentage of women (84% vs 91%), and racial distribution were similar in the 2 groups (P > .05). In the surgical group, median income was lower ($31,530 vs $34,404; P = .07) and 52% of patients were uninsured compared with 30% of patients treated medically (P < .0001).ConclusionsA disproportionate number of uninsured patients underwent thyroidectomy for Graves' disease. Social and economic factors may have a role in determining definitive therapy for Graves' disease.
