Implementation of an acute care surgery service at an academic trauma center

BackgroundThe establishment of acute care surgery is rapidly becoming a solution to meet emergency surgical needs. Challenges include competition for emergency surgery opportunities and the ability to economically sustain a practice.MethodsClinical activity was measured by reviewing the institutional and practice plan databases. Work relative value units and practice plan collection rates defined clinical activity and revenue.ResultsOperative procedures and intensive care unit activity accounted for 52% and 36% of activity, respectively. Although procedures on the digestive tract accounted for half of the operative activity, significant activity was observed in nearly all other systems. Overall clinical productivity remained constant but did demonstrate a 25% increase in operative work relative value units. Current billing activity supports 4.0 clinical full-time equivalents, but estimated collections would cover <73% of physician direct costs.ConclusionsThe authors describe the implementation of an acute care surgery service that combines trauma, emergency general surgery, and surgical critical care in an established academic surgery department. Developing a sustainable economic model must include income sources other than patient service revenue.