Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease

BackgroundAlthough many reports have described laparoscopic pancreatic surgery, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has not been widely accepted. The present study aimed to compare laparoscopy-assisted and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) to investigate the feasibility, safety, and tumor clearance.MethodsFifteen patients with periampullary disease underwent laparoscopy-assisted PPPD, in which resection was performed laparoscopically and the reconstruction was performed through a small midline incision. These patients were compared with 15 patients who, during the same period, underwent conventional open PPPD.ResultsMean operative time and mean blood loss were similar between groups. No significant differences in the incidence of complications or hospital stay were noted between groups. Surgical margin and number of lymph nodes found in the resected specimen did not differ between groups.ConclusionsLaparoscopy-assisted PPPD is on the same level with conventional open surgery in terms of perioperative outcomes or treatment efficacy.