Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4282765 Asian Journal of Surgery 2009 5 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundAntibiotic prophylaxis for inguinal hernioplasty is still practiced in many hospitals to prevent consequences of infected mesh, mesh removal and hernia recurrence. The common route of administration is intravenous. However this method can be associated with systemic side effects. Alternatively, locally applied antibiotics have been used and proven to significantly reduce the infection rate after inguinal hernioplasty.MethodsThis was a single blinded prospective randomised trial with a primary aim to compare the superficial surgical wound infection (SSSI) rate between locally applied gentamicin against systemic gentamicin in elective unilateral inguinal hernioplasty. All patients underwent the Lichtenstein tension-free repair. The secondary aim was to identify risk factors associated with the development of SSSI.ResultsA total of 202 patients were recruited. There were fourteen SSSI, seven in each arm. The overall SSSI rate was 6.9%. There was no significant difference between the locally applied versus intravenous administered antibiotics (p = 0.97). Factors found to contribute to SSSI were diabetes mellitus (p = 0.006), age 60–70 years (p = 0.023), adhesions (p = 0.001), duration of surgery > 90 minutes (p = 0.048), duration of hernia > 24 months (p = 0.001) and the presence of haematoma (p = 0.001).ConclusionLocally applied gentamicin is equivalent to intravenous gentamicin in preventing SSSI post primary inguinal hernioplasty.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Surgery