| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4286661 | International Journal of Surgery | 2014 | 4 Pages |
IntroductionDue to the frequent use of neck ultrasonography, the incidence of differentiated thyroid microcarcinoma (DTMC), defined as a lesion with greatest dimension ≤1 cm, is increasing worldwide. Although DTMC generally has a lower aggressivity and a better prognosis than differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), some cases of clinically aggressive DTMC were found. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of recurrence in DTMC and DTC, during a 3-year follow-up.MethodsPatients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma, who underwent total thyroidectomy and postoperative 131I-RAI ablation, were stratified according to lesion diameter (DTC for diameter > 1 cm or DTMC ≤ 1 cm). After surgery, patients underwent a 3-year follow-up. Recurrent disease was defined on the basis of positive biochemical (Tg > 2 ng/ml under TSH-suppression or after rhTSH-stimulation) and/or imaging (US, WBS, CT, PET/CT) findings.Results449 patients have been included in the final analysis. Linfoadenectomy rate and RAI ablative dose were significantly higher in DTC than in DTMC (32.7% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.018 and112.3 ± 21 vs. 68.3 ± 24.1 mCi, p < 0.001). During the follow-up, 50 carcinoma recurrences occurred, more frequent in DTC than in DTMC (15.6% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.010). After adjustment for gender, age, rate of lymph node dissection and 131I dose of RAI treatment, the difference in the risk of recurrence was no longer significant among DTC and DTMC patients (HR: 1.585, 95% CI 0874–2877, p = 0.130).ConclusionsThe prediction of disease severity cannot be based exclusively on lesion diameter. A more careful therapeutic approach and follow-up should be recommended in DTMC patients.
