Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4290657 | Journal of the American College of Surgeons | 2016 | 12 Pages |
BackgroundThe benefits of prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) remain controversial in clinically node-negative (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical impact of pCND with a large group of cN0 PTC patients.Study DesignA total of 11,569 cN0 PTC patients who underwent thyroidectomy between January 1997 and June 2015 were investigated. Using Cox multivariate analysis, the prognostic impact of pCND was assessed using subset analyses according to various clinicopathologic conditions. Using propensity score matching, various surgical morbidities were assessed under adjusted conditions.ResultsOf 11,569 cN0 PTC patients, 8,735 (75.5%) underwent pCND. Prophylactic CND did not significantly decrease the risk of locoregional recurrence in cN0 PTC patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.874; p = 0.392). In addition, pCND did not significantly decrease the risk of locoregional recurrence in various surgical extents (lobectomy and ipsilateral pCND [adjusted HR = 0.636; p = 0.131], total thyroidectomy and ipsilateral pCND [adjusted HR = 0.775; p = 0.164], and total thyroidectomy and bilateral pCND [adjusted HR = 1.041; p = 0.821]). However, surgical morbidities, such as temporary vocal cord palsy (5.6% vs 2.5%; p = 0.001), temporary hypoparathyroidism (30.8% vs 16.7%; p < 0.001), and permanent hypoparathyroidism (3.5% vs 1.7%; p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in the pCND(+) group.ConclusionsGiven the lack of proven benefits and the clear evidence of morbidities, pCND cannot be recommended as a routine procedure. We suggest that CND be reserved for therapeutic situations.