Imaging surveillance and survival for surgically resected non–small-cell lung cancer

IntroductionThe importance of imaging surveillance after treatment for lung cancer is not well characterized. We examined the association between initial guideline recommended imaging surveillance and survival among early-stage resected non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare data (1995–2010). Surgically resected patients, with stage I and II NSCLC, were categorized by imaging received during the initial surveillance period (4–8 mo) after surgery. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary treatment interventions were examined as intermediary outcomes.ResultsMost (88%) patients had at least one outpatient clinic visit, and 24% received an initial computerized tomography (CT) during the first surveillance period. Five-year survival by initial surveillance imaging was 61% for CT, 58% for chest radiography, and 60% for no imaging. After adjustment, initial CT was not associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96–1.14). On subgroup analysis, restricted to patients with demonstrated initial postoperative follow-up, CT was associated with a lower overall risk of death for stage I patients (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74–0.98), but not for stage II (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.71–1.42). There was no significant difference in rates of secondary interventions predicted by type of initial imaging surveillance.ConclusionsInitial surveillance CT is not associated with improved overall or lung cancer –specific survival among early-stage NSCLC patients undergoing surgical resection. Stage I patients with early follow-up may represent a subpopulation that benefits from initial surveillance although this may be influenced by healthy patient selection bias.