| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4300219 | Journal of Surgical Research | 2014 | 7 Pages |
BackgroundWe recently reported a grading system for surgical complications. This system proved to have a high sensitivity for recording minor but meaningful complications prolonging hospital stay in patients after colorectal surgery. We aimed to prospectively validate the complication grading system in a general surgery department over 1 year.MethodsAll surgical procedures and related complications were prospectively recorded between January 1st and December 31st, 2009. Surgical complications were graded on a severity scale of 1-5. The system classifies short-term outcome by grade emphasizing intensity of therapy required for treatment of the defined complication.ResultsDuring the study period, 2114 patients underwent surgery. Elective and oncological surgeries were performed in 1606 (76%) and 465 (22%) patients, respectively. There were 422 surgical complications in 304 (14%) patients (Grade 1/2: 203 [67%]; Grade 3/4: 90 [29%]; Grade 5: 11 [4%]).Median length of stay correlated significantly with complication severity: 2.3 d for no complication, 6.2 and 11.8 d for Grades 1/2 and 3/4, respectively (P < 0.001). Older age (OR 2.75, P < 0.001), comorbidities (OR 1.44, P = 0.02), American Society of Anesthesiology score >2 (OR 2.07, P < 0.001), contamination Grade (OR 1.85, P = 0.001), oncological (OR 2.82, P < 0.001), open (OR 1.22, P = 0.03), prolonged >120 min (OR 2.08, P < 0.001), and emergency surgery (OR 1.42, P = 0.02) independently predicted postoperative complications.ConclusionsThis system of grading surgical complications permits standardized reporting of surgical morbidity according to the severity of impact. Prospective validation of this system supports its use in a general surgery setting as a tool for surgical outcome assessment and quality assurance.
