Axillary Lymph Node Drainage Pathways from Intradermal and Intraparenchymal Breast Planes

BackgroundTo compare functional anatomy of breast peri-areolar and peri-tumoral lymphatic drainage basins.MethodsFifteen breast cancer patients received simultaneous peri-areolar (intradermal) and peri-tumoral (intraparenchymal) injections of human polyclonal immunoglobulin (HIG) labeled with 99mTc and 111In 2 to 4 h before axillary lymph node clearance surgery. Resected nodes (range 5–20; median 16) were individually counted for 99mTc and 111In in a well-counter and ranked according to activity content (echelon). Activity in distal nodes was negligible so extraction efficiency (E) of HIG in the first echelon node was calculated as counts divided by total counts in the chain.ResultsFive- to 10-fold more activity was recovered after intradermal injection. The injection planes identified the same first echelon node in 10 patients (group 1) but different in five (group 2). In group 1, intradermal E correlated with intra-parenchymal E (r = 0.82; P < 0.01). E of intradermal first echelon nodes in group 2 was 51 (SD 13)%, similar to intradermal E in group 1 (58 [23]%). E of intraparenchymal first echelon nodes in group 2, however, was 28 (6)%, lower than intraparenchymal E in group 1 (54 [20]%; P < 0.02).ConclusionsLymph nodes extract ∼50% of HIG. Extracted HIG does not cascade to distal nodes, validating HIG for sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy. HIG injected intradermally at the areola drains via a single route to the axilla. In two-thirds of patients, peri-tumoral HIG follows a similar route, but in one-third of patients drainage from the parenchymal plane is more complex, with more than one route to the axilla.