| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4307517 | Surgery | 2014 | 9 Pages |
BackgroundWhereas standard (infracarinal) mediastinal lymphadenectomy refers to the clearance of lymph nodes in the middle and lower posterior mediastinum, extension along right side of trachea and upper mediastinum is termed extended lymphadenectomy. The benefit of an extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is unclear.MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of 391 patients undergoing tri-incisional esophagectomy (McKeown type) for squamous cell carcinoma between 1995 and 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 136 and 255 patients in the infracarinal and extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy groups, respectively. The outcome of these two groups and the clinical importance of right upper mediastinum lymph node metastases (LNM) were investigated.ResultsBoth groups were comparable in clinicopathologic characteristics except tumor length (infracarinal vs extended group, 4.6 vs 5.2 cm, P = .023) and lymph node status. The 5-year overall survival rates were 29.7% and 27.3%, in the infracarinal and extended groups, respectively (P = .065). In the extended group, the factors correlated to right upper mediastinal LNM included neck LNM (hazard ratio [HR] 2.621, P = .029), abdominal LNM (HR 2.218, P = .016), and tumor locating in the upper/middle third of esophagus (HR 2.781, P = .014). The independent prognostic factors for overall survival included right upper mediastinal LNM (HR 1.964, P < .001), lower mediastinal LNM (HR 1.391, P = .039), and abdominal LNM (HR 1.538, P = .006).ConclusionThe procedure of right upper mediastinum lymphadenectomy is not associated with better survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients; the presence of upper mediastinum LNM predicted poor prognosis.
