Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4310194 Surgery 2008 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundArterial inflow occlusion is a well-known mechanism of renal injury during major vascular surgery. In contrast, renal injury from venous outflow obstruction is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to examine the injury pattern of renal venous outflow obstruction, compare this with the traditional model of arterial occlusion, and examine possible mechanisms.MethodsMale Fisher rats were used for the renal warm ischemia model. Twenty-five minutes of renal ischemia was induced by selectively occluding either the renal artery or vein. After 24 h of reperfusion, whole blood and kidney tissue were collected for further analysis.ResultsSerum creatinine (SCr) concentrations taken 24 h after reperfusion were significantly greater in the venous occlusion group (V) when compared to the arterial group (A). While histology did not demonstrate significant differences in extent of necrosis between both groups, a stronger inflammatory response resulted from venous occlusion. Specifically, significantly greater MCP-1 mRNA and significantly greater MCP-1, TNF-α, and HO-1 protein levels were found in the venous group, while no differences in MIP-2, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 mRNA expression existed between A and V. Further analysis demonstrated presence of increased cleaved caspase-3 protein in the artery group than in the venous group.ConclusionsVenous renal outflow obstruction results in more severe functional renal injury when compared to arterial inflow occlusion. Macrophage activation and neutrophilic infiltration appear to be exaggerated during venous occlusion.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Surgery
Authors
, , , , , , , ,