Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4312732 Behavioural Brain Research 2013 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

Stroke causes disability and mortality worldwide and is divided into ischemic and hemorrhagic subtypes. Although clinical trials suggest distinct recovery profiles for ischemic and hemorrhagic events, this is not conclusive due to stroke heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to produce similar brain damage, using experimental models of ischemic (IS) and hemorrhagic (HS) stroke and evaluate the motor spontaneous recovery profile. We used 31 Wistar rats divided into the following groups: Sham (n = 7), ischemic (IS) (n = 12) or hemorrhagic (HS) (n = 12). Brain ischemia or hemorrhage was induced by endotelin-1 (ET-1) and collagenase type IV-S (collagenase) microinjections, respectively. All groups were evaluated in the open field, cylinder and ladder walk behavioral tests at distinct time points as from baseline to 30 days post-surgery (30 PS). Histological and morphometric analyses were used to assess the volume of lost tissue and lesion length. Present results reveal that both forms of experimental stroke had a comparable long-term pattern of damage, since no differences were found in volume of tissue lost or lesion size 30 days after surgery. However, behavioral data showed that hemorrhagic rats were less impaired at skilled walking than ischemic ones at 15 and 30 days post-surgery. We suggest that experimentally comparable stroke design is useful because it reduces heterogeneity and facilitates the assessment of neurobiological differences related to stroke subtypes; and that spontaneous skilled walking recovery differs between experimental ischemic and hemorrhagic insults.

► ET-1 and collagenase could produce comparable ischemic and hemorrhagic injuries. ► Ischemic and hemorrhagic rats showed similar spontaneous locomotor activity. ► Ischemic and hemorrhagic rats showed similar forelimb asymmetry profile. ► Hemorrhagic stroke showed better performance in skilled walking then ischemic form.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
, , , , , , , ,