Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4313589 Behavioural Brain Research 2011 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

Advances in mouse genetic technology have spurred increasing interest in the development of cognitive tasks for mice. Here, we describe and discuss the modifications necessary to adapt a task for the assessment of sustained attention performance for use in mice, including for taxing the top-down control of such performance. The validity of the Sustained Attention Task (SAT), including the distractor version (dSAT), has previously been demonstrated in rats and humans. This task requires moveable or retractable operanda; insertion of operanda into the operant chambers cues animals to respond to a prior signal or non-signal event, reporting either a hit or a miss, or a correct rejection or false alarm, respectively. Retractable levers did not support sufficiently high and stable levels of performance in mice. Given the widespread use of static nose-poke devices for testing operant performance in mice, we therefore designed and fabricated a retractable nose-poke device. As this device extends into chambers, a hole for nose-poking is slowly opened and closed again as the device retracts (termed the “Michigan Controlled Access Response Port”, MICARP). Results describe the effects of variation of signal duration and event rate, trial outcome and trial type probability, effects of mice deprivation levels, and the reliability of SAT and dSAT performance. Mice perform the SAT and dSAT at levels comparable to those observed in rats. This task will be of assistance in expanding the translational usefulness of the SAT and dSAT.

► Design and validation of a task for assessing sustained attention in mice. ► Design of retractable nose poke device (MICARP) as an operandum. ► The distractor condition of the SAT (dSAT) taxes top-down control mechanisms. ► Performance levels, including distractor effects, are comparable to rats. ► These methods and results expand the translational usefulness of the SAT/dSAT.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
, , , ,