Kinematic features of movement tunes perception and action coupling

How do we extrapolate the final position of hand trajectory that suddenly vanishes behind a wall? Studies showing maintenance of cortical activity after objects in motion disappear suggest that internal model of action may be recalled to reconstruct the missing part of the trajectory. Although supported by neurophysiological and brain imaging studies, behavioural evidence for this hypothesis is sparse. Further, in humans, it is unknown if the recall of internal model of action at motion observation can be tuned with kinematic features of movement.Here, we propose a novel experiment to address this question. Each stimulus consisted of a dot moving either upwards or downwards, and corresponding to vertical arm movements that were masked in the last part of the trajectory. The stimulus could either move according to biological and or non-biological kinematic laws of pointing tasks. We compared subjects’ estimations of the stimulus vanishing or final positions after biological and after non-biological motion displays. Subjects systematically overestimated the vanishing and final position for the two directions (up and down) and the two kinematics displayed (biological and non-biological). However, estimation of the final position decreased in precision and increased in variability for movements that violated the kinematic laws of arm pointing task.The results suggest that motion inference does not rely only upon visual extrapolating mechanisms based on past visual trajectory information. We propose that motion estimation relies on internal models that contain specific kinematic details of vertical arm movement, which can be rapidly recalled during motion observation.