Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4316580 Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 2015 20 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Heterogeneity limits our ability to identify the underlying neurobiology of ADHD.•We used neuroimaging data and community detection to identify subgroups of children.•We identified three subgroups of children with and without ADHD.•Atypical connections in ADHD were specific to subgroup membership.•Differentiation in subgroups is related to delay discounting and activity level.

One potential obstacle limiting our ability to clarify ADHD etiology is the heterogeneity within the disorder, as well as in typical samples. In this study, we utilized a community detection approach on 106 children with and without ADHD (aged 7–12 years), in order to identify potential subgroups of participants based on the connectivity of the reward system. Children with ADHD were compared to typically developing children within each identified community, aiming to find the community-specific ADHD characteristics. Furthermore, to assess how the organization in subgroups relates to behavior, we evaluated delay-discounting gradient and impulsivity-related temperament traits within each community. We found that discrete subgroups were identified that characterized distinct connectivity profiles in the reward system. Importantly, which connections were atypical in ADHD relative to the control children were specific to the community membership. Our findings showed that children with ADHD and typically developing children could be classified into distinct subgroups according to brain functional connectivity. Results also suggested that the differentiation in “functional” subgroups is related to specific behavioral characteristics, in this case impulsivity. Thus, combining neuroimaging data and community detection might be a valuable approach to elucidate heterogeneity in ADHD etiology and examine ADHD neurobiology.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
, , , , , , , ,