Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4411627 Chemosphere 2010 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

This paper evaluates the performance of liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) in separating and concentrating aqueous fullerene (nC60) from wastewater and compares UV–vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry for the quantification of C60. LLE was suitable for multiple wastewater matrices, while SPE required filtration or reclaimed wastewater and secondary effluent of less suspended solids. Calibration curves plotted as peak areas of UV absorbance at 332 nm against spiked nC60 concentrations showed good linearity over a range of 20–200 μg L−1 after 10-fold concentration by LLE, but only over the range of 0.8–2 μg L−1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.8–4 μg L−1 for secondary effluent after 1000-fold concentration by SPE. Recoveries of nC60 by LLE were in the range of 89–94% with a standard deviation (SD) not more than 2% and recoveries of nC60 by SPE were much lower, only 18% for reclaimed wastewater and 9% for secondary effluent. The method detection limits (MDLs) of LLE with UV–vis spectroscopy were 3–4 μg L−1 for six water matrices and the MDLs of SPE with UV–vis spectroscopy were 0.42 μg L−1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.64 μg L−1 for secondary effluent. UV–vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry gave similar sensitivity. With LLE, mass spectrometry offered a small linear range of 20–60 μg L−1, but it provided specificity based on the mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) of the molecular ions. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of the combination of different extraction and detection methods to quantify nC60 in engineered wastewater matrices.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Environmental Science Environmental Chemistry
Authors
, , ,