| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4438267 | Atmospheric Environment | 2013 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
⺠MoO and photolytic converters for measuring NO2 were compared at four field sites. ⺠Overestimation of NO2 by the MoO converter ranged from 6% to 280%. ⺠The overestimation depended on both air-parcel age and composition of NOz. ⺠A 'true' NO2 or a NOy system is recommended for areas away from fresh NOx emission sources.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Atmospheric Science
Authors
Zheng Xu, Tao Wang, L.K. Xue, Peter K.K. Louie, Connie W.Y. Luk, J. Gao, S.L. Wang, F.H. Chai, W.X. Wang,