Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4459544 Remote Sensing of Environment 2011 11 Pages PDF
Abstract

Disturbed forests may need decades to reach a mature stage and optically-based vegetation indices are usually poorly suited for monitoring purposes due to the rapid saturation of the signal with increasing canopy cover. Spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data provide an alternate monitoring approach since the backscattered microwave energy is sensitive to the vegetation structure. Images from two regions in Spain and Alaska were used to analyze SAR metrics (cross-polarized backscatter and co-polarized interferometric coherence) from regrowing forests previously affected by fire. TerraSAR-X X-band backscatter showed the lowest sensitivity to forest regrowth, with the average backscatter increasing by 1–2 dB between the most recent fire scar and the unburned forest. Increased sensitivity (around 3–4 dB) was observed for C-band Envisat Advanced Synthetic Aperture (ASAR) backscatter. The Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) Phased Array-type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) L-band backscatter presented the highest dynamic range from unburned to recently burned forests (approximately 8 dB). The interferometric coherence showed low sensitivity to forest regrowth at all SAR frequencies. For Mediterranean forests, five phases of forest regrowth were discerned whereas for boreal forest, up to four different regrowth phases could be discerned with L-band SAR data. In comparison, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) provided reliable differentiation only for the most recent development stages. The results obtained were consistent in both environments.

Research highlights► L-band HV backscatter allowed the best differentiation of forest regrowth phases. ► X- and C-band HV backscatter was less sensitive to modification in forest structure. ► Coherence presented weak sensitivity to forest regrowth phases at all wavelengths. ► L-band SAR data provided larger monitoring intervals when compared to NDVI.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences Computers in Earth Sciences
Authors
, , , , ,