| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4618842 | Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications | 2010 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
We demonstrate that eight from twenty seven solutions obtained by Li and Dai [Abundant new exact solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional Jimbo–Miwa equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 361 (2010) 587–590] are wrong and do not satisfy the equation. The other nineteen exact solutions are not new solutions and can be found from the well-known solution.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Analysis
