Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4630716 | Applied Mathematics and Computation | 2012 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
In the early years of set theory, Du Bois Reymond introduced a vague notion of infinitary pantachie meant to symbolize an infinity bigger than the infinity of real numbers. Hausdorff reformulated this concept rigorously as a maximal chain (a linearly ordered subset) in a partially ordered set of certain type, for instance, the set NNNN under eventual domination. Hausdorff proved the existence of a pantachy in any partially ordered set, using the axiom of choice AC. We show in this note that the pantachy existence theorem fails in the absense of AC, and moreover, even if AC is assumed, hence pantachies do exist, one may not be able to come up with an individual, effectively defined example of a pantachy.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Applied Mathematics
Authors
Vladimir Kanovei, Vassily Lyubetsky,