Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4659098 | Topology and its Applications | 2012 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The idea of computing Matveev complexity by using Heegaard decompositions has been recently developed by two different approaches: the first one for closed 3-manifolds via crystallization theory, yielding the notion of Gem–Matveev complexity; the other one for compact orientable 3-manifolds via generalized Heegaard diagrams, yielding the notion of modified Heegaard complexity. In this paper we extend to the non-orientable case the definition of modified Heegaard complexity and prove that for closed 3-manifolds Gem–Matveev complexity and modified Heegaard complexity coincide. Hence, they turn out to be useful different tools to compute the same upper bound for Matveev complexity.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Geometry and Topology