Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4662034 | Annals of Pure and Applied Logic | 2010 | 16 Pages |
Abstract
We associate with any game G another game, which is a variant of it, and which we call . Winning strategies for have a lower recursive degree than winning strategies for G: if a player has a winning strategy of recursive degree 1 over G, then it has a recursive winning strategy over , and vice versa. Through we can express in algorithmic form, as a recursive winning strategy, many (but not all) common proofs of non-constructive Mathematics, namely exactly the theorems of the sub-classical logic Limit Computable Mathematics (Hayashi (2006) [6], , Hayashi and Nakata (2001) [7]).
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Logic