Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4662867 | Journal of Applied Logic | 2014 | 17 Pages |
Abstract
I claim that an argument from the philosophy of statistics can be improved by using Carnapian inductive logic. Gelman and Shalizi [9] criticise a philosophical account of how statisticians ought to choose statistical models which they call ‘the received view of Bayesian inference’ and propose a different account inspired by falsificationist philosophy of science. I introduce another philosophical account inspired by Carnapian inductive logic and argue that it is even better than Gelman and Shalizi's falsificationist account.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Mathematics
Logic
Authors
Teddy Groves,