Paleomagnetism of the Miocene Jantetelco Granodiorites and Tepexco Volcanic Group and inferences for crustal block rotations in central Mexico — Reevaluation

•Miocene rocks from central Mexico were studied to check for tectonic movements.•25 paleomagnetic sites have both polarities and directions pass a reversal test.•Mean direction and paleopole are indistinguishable from North America reference data.•The study area has not experienced any significant deformation since Miocene.•This work refutes a much older work which suggested a 50° counterclockwise rotation.

Miocene igneous rocks from a location in central Mexico provide paleomagnetic data that allow re-evaluation of previous data by Urrutia-Fucugauchi (1981) that were interpreted to suggest a counter clockwise rotation of a crustal block by about 50°. We sampled 31 sites from the Miocene trondhjemitic Chalcatzingo domes, the Tepexco volcanic group, and the Xalostoc diorite, covering the same area of approximately 50 km2 about 90 km SE of Mexico City. Magnetic analysis shows that these rocks contain magnetic phases of variable composition, with Curie temperatures characteristic for magnetite, but often accompanied by lower Curie temperature components. Magnetic hysteresis measurements point to the presence of PSD particles, and in combination these properties suggest that these rocks are also suitable for paleomagnetic study. Scanning electron microscope analysis supports the rock magnetic results, indicating the presence of magnetite and high-intermediate titanium titanomagnetite in many samples. Demagnetization experiments showed in most cases characteristic remanence directions of reasonable to good quality, and for 26 sites mean directions could be determined. Of these 14 (12) are of normal (reverse) polarity. Overall mean directions of normal and reverse sites are antipodal and pass a reversal test at the 95% probability level. The paleodirection from 26 sites is D = 348.1°E, I = 35.7°, α95 = 7.4°, and the paleopole is located at Lat = 78.3°N, Long = 184.2°E, A95 = 7.0°, which is indistinguishable from the 20 Ma reference pole for the stable North America plate. These data do not support any tectonic deformation of the sampling area since the Miocene. Based on the number of sites studied, their rock magnetic characteristics, and the quality of the magnetic remanence that results in a positive reversal test, we consider our data to be reliable and we therefore suggest that this result supersedes that of Urrutia-Fucugauchi (1981). The reason for this previous and much different result remains unknown.