Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4693596 Tectonophysics 2010 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

We use a triangular representation of the plunges of P, B, and T axes to compare the different ways tectonic regime is inferred from earthquake focal mechanisms in recent works. We argue that P, B, and T axes provide a reasonable estimate of principal stress directions when faulting is close to Andersonian conditions, and that this can be estimated from the location on a triangular diagram. We analyze the geometrical relationship between the plunges of P, B, and T axes on one hand, and the rake of slip and dip of nodal planes on the other hand. We show that the rake and dip level curves correspond to trajectories of the vertical direction along great and small circles with respect to the frame of the P, B, and T axes. This shows that dip-slip faulting is compatible with vertical P or T axes, but does not require it, and instead requires horizontal B axes. It also shows that strike-slip faulting does not require vertical B axes, but P and T axes with equal plunges. This also reveals that focal mechanisms where P, B, and T axes all have moderate plunge correspond to two very different types of nodal planes: a steeply dipping one with oblique slip and a moderately dipping one with strike-slip. Seismically active and moderately dipping strike-slip faults are to be found among these events.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences Earth-Surface Processes
Authors
,