Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4718948 | Marine Geology | 2010 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
A comet impact on February 13, 1491Â AD, 250Â km SW of New Zealand, named “Mahuika”, has been proposed as the tsunamigenic source for an alleged large 15th century tsunami along the New Zealand and east Australian coastlines. This hypothesis has been based on astronomic and atmospheric evidence and data from near the putative impact site, but the underpinning documentation has never been fully presented. We outline the current Mahuika comet impact tsunami hypothesis and analyse the original data sources. Geophysical evidence for a crater has never been documented; tektites are widespread in south Pacific sediments and provide no indication of the event age, and far-field evidence for any comet impact in the 15th century is unconvincing. All the evidence reviewed indicates that no comet, “Mahuika” or otherwise, struck the Earth on February 13, 1491Â AD. Based upon our reassessment, the origin of apparent tsunami deposits along the coasts of New Zealand and east Australia needs to be reassessed - they are not tsunami deposits. The Mahuika comet impact tsunami hypothesis should be treated with extreme caution until stronger evidence is presented.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geochemistry and Petrology
Authors
James Goff, Dale Dominey-Howes, Catherine Chagué-Goff, Claire Courtney,