| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4928185 | Sustainable Cities and Society | 2017 | 19 Pages | 
Abstract
												The genetic algorithm model that uses EnergyPlus to simulate indoor temperature generally achieves higher convergence to the optimal value, which also is the one that uses more electricity from the PV system to operate the HVAC. The dynamic programming performs better than the genetic algorithm (both coupled with STM). However, it is limited by the fact that uses STM, which is a less accurate model to simulate indoor temperature especially because it is not considering thermal inertia.
											Keywords
												Fan coilPV productionEnergyPlusPMvCOPPPDSTMBEMSIEAThermal comfortInternational energy agencyGenetic algorithmISODynamic programmingEnergy efficiencyOptimizationHVACAir conditionerStorageInternational Organization for StandardizationBuilding energy management systemcoefficient of performancePhoto-VoltaicDemand responseHeating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
												Related Topics
												
													Physical Sciences and Engineering
													Energy
													Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
												
											Authors
												Henrique Pombeiro, Maria João Machado, Carlos Silva, 
											