Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4938444 | English for Specific Purposes | 2017 | 17 Pages |
Abstract
Medical students often lack key skills in academic writing, yet good academic writing is often a pre-requisite for employment, promotion and enculturation into the profession. This article focuses on the rhetorical strategies used for the presentation of academic stance by student writers of dentistry research reports. Adopting a contrastive, corpus-based approach, we compare student writing with that of comparable professionally-written research reports for evidence of hedging, boosting, self-mention and attitude markers. Our findings indicate that professional reports exhibit a narrower set of linguistic devices than used by student writers, who tend to use a much wider range of the four stance feature types analysed for discussion of both others' and their own personal stance, both across whole texts and by section. We discuss pedagogical implications for ESP professionals working to more closely align student writing with that of professional norms.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
Language and Linguistics
Authors
Peter Crosthwaite, Lisa Cheung, Feng (Kevin) Jiang,