Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4941153 | Research in Developmental Disabilities | 2017 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
In this study, the three strategies that were used to assess SU in individuals with MBID differed significantly in participation rates, but not in SU rates. Several explanations for the better-than-expected performance of self- and collateral-reports are presented. We conclude that for individuals with MBID, self-report combined with collateralreport can be used to assess current SU, and this combination may contribute to collaborative, early intervention efforts to reduce SU and its related harms in this vulnerable group.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
Joanneke E.L. VanDerNagel, Marion Kiewik, Marike van Dijk, Robert Didden, Hubert P.L.M. Korzilius, Job van der Palen, Jan K. Buitelaar, Donald R.A. Uges, Remco A. Koster, Cor A.J. de Jong,