Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4978574 | Accident Analysis & Prevention | 2017 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
The game decreased answer latency and marginally changed response bias in a less conservative direction for both children and adults, but it did not significantly increase sensitivity for targets. Adults performed better in the tests and in the game, and it was possible to satisfactorily predict group membership based on the scores. Children found it especially difficult to find covert targets. Overall, the described version of the learning game cannot be regarded as an effective tool for situation awareness/hazard perception training, but ways to improve the game are discussed.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Chemical Health and Safety
Authors
Esko Lehtonen, Heidi Sahlberg, Emilia Rovamo, Heikki Summala,