| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4980310 | Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries | 2017 | 30 Pages |
Abstract
HAZOP is widely recognized as the standard for conducting thorough PHA reviews, but it is not the only technique available. In this paper, outcomes of three actual HAZOP reviews in the oil & gas industry are compared and contrasted with the results for the same facilities using Process Flow Failure Modes (PFFM). PFFM is a unique method, best described as a highly efficient, highly effective cross between FMEA and HAZOP, enhanced by a customized visual tool. Differences in the success rate of the two methodologies to identify process hazards are quantified and discussed with the aim of improving the industry success rate in identifying process hazards during PHA reviews in a cost-effective, straightforward manner.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Chemical Health and Safety
Authors
R.J. MacGregor,