Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4996410 | Biomass and Bioenergy | 2017 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
DM losses of 23.3% and 22.7% were determined using methods M1 and M2, respectively. The DM losses calculated using M3 and M4 were considerably lower at 13.9% and 16.6%, respectively. The M2 method proved to be the most suitable for periodic determination of storage losses in a similar experimental design.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Process Chemistry and Technology
Authors
Hannes Lenz, Ralf Pecenka, Christine Idler, Sabrina Dumfort, Carly Whittaker, Christian Ammon, Eberhard Hartung,