Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4996774 Bioresource Technology 2017 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

•The mechanism of the TPAD system changed with the temperature combinations.•VS removals were enhanced by 8% for TM-TPAD and by 14.5% for HM-TPAD.•The microbial structures in both stages of conventional TPAD were similar.•Distinct microbial communities were found between stages in the HM-TPAD.•Maintaining at 70 °C is an effective measure to achieve phase separation.

In order to investigate the phase separation and microbial distribution in the TPAD, the conventional thermophilic-mesophilic type (TM-TPAD) and the hyperthermophilic-mesophilic type (HM-TPAD) were operated with a single-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MAD) as control. HM-TPAD accomplished the volatile solids destruction 14.5% higher than MAD. Calculating conversion efficiencies distinguished the separation of acidogenic and methanogenic phases in HM-TPAD, which was not found in TM-TPAD. The differences on microbial distributions also reflected the phase separation in HM-TPAD. The protein degraders, Coprothermobacter had higher abundance in the first stage than the second stage of HM-TPAD but it had similar abundance between the two stages of TM-TPAD. Also, the archaeal communities from the two stages of HM-TPAD shared the least similarity but those from the two stages of TM-TPAD were closely similar.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Process Chemistry and Technology
Authors
, , , , , ,