Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5012216 | Energy Conversion and Management | 2017 | 19 Pages |
Abstract
Examining the Fuzzy method results for example, in the first scenario, which doesn't consider power density, ecological function density and exergy destruction rate density meet their optimum values, 1.314 and 0.3864â¯kW/m2, respectively. However, energy efficiency falls by 10% compared to its maximum, which occurs in the third scenario (0.6676), where ecological function density isn't included, and power density drops by 25% compared to its own in the second scenario (2.2783â¯kW/m2), where energy efficiency is not. This indicates the strong confliction between the objective functions and also the necessity of this kind of analysis. However, the first scenario would roughly provide the best condition for the system if one wanted all the objective functions to be optimum all together.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy (General)
Authors
Mohammad Ali Jokar, Mohammad H. Ahmadi, Mohsen Sharifpur, Josua P. Meyer, Fathollah Pourfayaz, Tingzhen Ming,