Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5030380 | Procedia Engineering | 2016 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
This article tries gaining insight in the effect of the partial factor starting by the analysis of a steel cable net structure according to Eurocode 3. Eurocode specifies a value of 1.35 for the partial factor for prestress. A cable net structure built in 1958, was used as a case study. In spite of the lack of design guidelines and calculation tools 58 years ago, the analysis according to the current design standard Eurocode 3 for steel shows that the results match quite well with the original calculation. Generally speaking, a reduction in the cross-section areas is observed using Eurocode 3. For the considered steel cable net structure a weight saving of 17% for a partial factor for prestress 1.35 is obtained. If a partial factor for the prestress 1.0 could be considered, the weight reduction would be 4% more. Furthermore, the article investigates the effect of the partial factor for prestress (1.0 or 1.35), there prestress contributes to the stiffness in the non-lineair structural behaviour of membrane structures. The value of the partial factor for prestress to be considered is a source of disagreement between experts in different countries. With a similar geometry as the steel cable net structure, a membrane structure is designed and analysed. For the primary steel structure the partial factor for prestress 1.35 has to be applied. A 2% weight saving for the pretension factor 1.0 versus 1.35 is obtained if the tensile surface including the membrane and the edge cables is considered separate from the primary structure. A sound conclusion though requires a thorough in-depth study for different shapes and for different membrane types.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Engineering (General)
Authors
Lincy Pyl, Xiduo Wang, Elien De Smedt, Jimmy Colliers, Marijke Mollaert, Lars De Laet,