Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5034038 | Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition | 2016 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Procedures around interviewing a police officer after a shooting have recently come under increased scrutiny. Some argue the officers should be allowed to view available video footage from body cameras and wait two to three days to de-stress before being interviewed. While viewing the video first may increase accuracy for details present in the footage, it may also cause forgetting or distortion for other parts of the situation not captured on camera, including the officer's perception and construal of the situation. Additionally, memory is likely to decay over any delay from a waiting period, with little support for the claim that a long de-stressing period will improve accuracy compared to an immediate report. Though this is a complex policy matter with many considerations, these procedures may do more harm than good when it comes to preserving the most accurate and helpful memory from the police officer.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Psychology
Applied Psychology
Authors
Rebecca Hofstein Grady, Brendon J. Butler, Elizabeth F. Loftus,