The impact of object type on the spatial analogies in Korean preschoolers

•Abstract objects better facilitate preschoolers' spatial analogies than realistic objects.•The advantage of abstract objects is most evident in cross-type transfer.•Children's locative vocabulary is linked with their spatial analogy skills.

We tested young children's spatial reasoning in a match-to-sample task, manipulating the objects in the task (abstract geometric shapes, line drawings of realistic objects, or both). Korean 4- and 5-year-old children (N = 161) generalized the target spatial configuration (i.e., on, in, above) more easily when the sample used geometric shapes and the choices used realistic objects than the reverse (i.e., realistic-object sample to geometric-shape choices). With within-type stimuli (i.e., sample and choices were both geometric shapes or both realistic objects), 5-year-old, but not 4-year-old, children generalized the spatial relations more easily with geometric shapes than realistic objects. In addition, children who knew more locative terms (e.g., “in”, “on”) performed better on the task, suggesting a link to children's spatial vocabulary. The results demonstrate an advantage of geometric shapes over realistic objects in facilitating young children's performance on a match-to-sample spatial reasoning task.